Search

Search work, writing, and fragments.

note

Apr 24, 2026 / 9 min read

A Small Funeral for Everything I Used to Step Over

A letter built around one question: whether love can kneel beside what everyone else would step over.

  • filed under Letter / Love / Personal
  • author Shuvam Pandey

writing

Some people become unforgettable by being impossible to miss.

You became impossible to forget by noticing what everyone else had permission to ignore.

You have made me unable to use the word only with the same ease.

The day you asked whether I would hold funerals for dead insects, we were walking back from somewhere that has since dissolved. The errand, the street, whatever we had been saying - gone. What remains: your sudden stillness near a corner of old brick, the way you crouched without transition, the way your body and the ground had some agreement that bypassed language entirely, bypassed even thought, the way a river finds low ground not by deciding but by being water.

I stopped because you stopped.

A bee. Or I think it was a bee. By the time it matters to me, it is already mostly gone from memory, which is itself a kind of second death, and I am sorry for it.

What I remember precisely: the quality of your looking. How it was not observation but something closer to accompaniment. How you were not studying the creature so much as sitting with it in whatever a bee’s dying is, whatever final sensation moves through six legs going still.

You looked up.

You asked like it was a real question. The kind that has weight. The kind that would accept no and remember it.

Would I?

I want you to understand what that question walked into.

I was standing there with twenty years of learned efficiency behind me. Twenty years of eyes aimed at destinations. Twenty years of moving through the world like someone who has read the terms and conditions and agreed that most of what happens is not his department. The whole architecture of a modern life: keep moving, stay useful, save your feeling for things that can justify the expense of it.

Your question arrived into that architecture like the first sign of a structural problem.

A hairline crack, no more than that.

But the building has not been the same since.

I almost laughed.

I need to tell you this clearly. I owe you that.

The laugh did not come from cruelty, or even from discomfort. It came from something older and more automatic: the reflex we learn before we learn our own name, the reflex that says make it smaller, make it safe, make it the kind of thing that cannot cost you. The reflex that turns another person’s open sincerity into an occasion for charm, for a gentle smile that keeps you at the exact height required to never have to kneel.

I felt it rise. A hand reaching for the familiar tool.

Then I saw your face.

And this is the thing I have never told anyone, the true center of this, the thing I am still unfolding two years later in quiet rooms:

It was not the tenderness in your face that stopped me.

It was the absence of apology.

You were not hoping I would understand. You were not performing mercy for my approval. You were not even checking whether I was the kind of man worth asking. You had already decided to bury the bee. The question was only whether I would be there, or whether you would do it alone the way you had done every other small, serious, unwitnessed thing before you made the mistake or the grace of meeting me.

You would have buried it either way.

That stopped me. The laugh dissolved there. I understood, for the first time, that I was in the presence of something that did not need me and wanted me anyway. The difference between those two things is the whole difference between being chosen and being required.

The word is only.

I want to stay here a moment because I think it is the most dangerous word in any language. More dangerous than words we have agreed to fear.

Only an insect. Only a feeling. Only a child’s drawing. Only a small sadness. Only a stranger. Only a passing thought. Only what no one important has agreed to name.

Every cruelty in history required this word, or its cousin, before it could be carried out. The work of diminishment is always done first in language, in the quiet reclassification of what matters, in the bureaucracy of attention. We decide something is only, and then our neglect of it stops feeling like neglect. It feels like accuracy.

You did not do this.

You do not do this.

I do not mean you are a saint. Saints are a different kind of problem, and I will get to that. I mean your attention does not seem to contain this mechanism at all - the sorting mechanism, the proportionality filter, the thing that grades suffering by scale before deciding whether to respond.

You seem to begin, always, from the creature itself: not its size, not whether mourning it would look reasonable to someone watching, but the fact of it. Its having been here. Its being here no longer.

I have spent a long time thinking about what it takes to maintain that.

What does not get destroyed in you, that gets destroyed in most of us, somewhere in the passage from childhood to the world?

What did you hold, or were you held through, or did you refuse, that kept that door from closing?

I do not know.

But I know what it looks like from the outside:

It looks like kneeling on concrete to sit with a dead bee.

It looks like a question asked without embarrassment.

It looks like the most natural thing in the world.

There is a kind of love letter that becomes dishonest by recording only beauty.

So let me tell you the harder part.

You are not consistent. You are not easy.

There are rooms in you that go dark without warning, that have no map I have found, that I have learned to wait outside rather than knock on, because knocking taught me nothing except the density of the silence inside.

You have sat with dying bees and walked past dying conversations. You have offered extraordinary patience to creatures that cannot speak and ordinary impatience to people who cannot stop speaking the wrong language, which is sometimes my language, which is sometimes me.

You are tender and you are sharp. You are merciful and you are sealed. You carry enormous kindness and enormous reserve and they do not take turns - they coexist, in some arrangement I cannot diagram, responding to logics I cannot fully decode.

You are also sometimes afraid.

I see it. You do not have to show it clearly for me to see it. The way you talk about yourself sometimes has the grammar of someone who learned early that they were a great deal for people. Too much. Too intense. Too serious about the wrong things. Someone who learned, through the ordinary surgery of being loved imperfectly, to apologize for the depth of their own attention.

I want to say something to that version of you, the one that learned to preemptively make herself smaller:

You were not too much.

You were in the wrong rooms.

And even this - even your difficulty, your sealed rooms, your sharpness, your fear - I would rather have it than the cleaned and simplified version of you that would fit inside my admiration without pressing against its edges.

Purity is thin.

It breaks easily, cleanly, and leaves no real wreckage.

You are not like that.

You are complicated the way that rivers are complicated - always the same river, always different water, carving as you move, changing the landscape in ways that take time to see.

I want the river.

Not a photograph of still water.

Before you, I had become someone I did not know I had become.

Gradual loss has a particular horror: you do not feel yourself changing. You feel yourself clarifying. Getting efficient. Getting realistic. Learning which feelings are worth the metabolic cost and which ones are indulgent, which ones signal depth and which ones signal that you have not yet made peace with the nature of the world.

I had made peace with the nature of the world.

I called it growing up.

What it actually was: I had learned to treat my own mercy as a limited resource to be rationed. I had learned that open attention is expensive, that grief without designated objects looks like weakness, that sincerity unprotected by irony is a kind of nudity that sophisticated people avoid.

I had learned to step over things.

And every step taught me, in the small accumulated grammar of behavior, who I was. Who I was becoming. What I was willing to let disappear without a ceremony.

I did not know I was being taught.

This is the important part.

The education is invisible because it masquerades as common sense, as adulthood, as the reasonable adjustment of expectations. Nobody stands above you and instructs you to stop kneeling. The world simply stops making room for the kneeling. Stops rewarding it. Stops reflecting it back. And eventually you stop, the way any behavior stops when it is met, for long enough, with nothing.

Then you.

Then your question.

Then the sudden, vertiginous feeling of looking down and realizing you are standing on what you stopped seeing, which means you are standing on a graveyard you have been crossing for years without removing your hat.

This is what you change: the scale of everything.

Not dramatically, and not by argument. You change it by the simple fact of where you place your attention, the way a single candle changes the darkness because it proves the darkness is not empty.

A floor becomes a jurisdiction. A windowsill becomes a last country. A crack in the sidewalk becomes the last address of something that had nowhere else to go.

And I, who had my hierarchies intact, who knew precisely which things warranted the ceremony of my feeling-

I stand there broken of my measurements.

Here is the precise thing you have done to me, the thing that is not metaphor:

You have made me unable to use the word only with the same ease.

Not unable to think it. I still think it. The reflex is not gone. But now it arrives already accompanied by the shadow of your face, the weight of what I know your question would be, the awareness that only is a choice made by a creature who could also choose otherwise.

A permanent change.

I do not know how to overstate what it means to have a permanent change made in you by a person. Not a lesson. Not an influence. A change to the basic architecture. A room added that was not there before, that you cannot board up, that the light comes through differently because of.

You added a room.

It is the room where small things are taken seriously.

I live in it now.

The question you really asked - underneath the question, in the part that words carry the way water carries minerals, silently, invisibly, changing everything they touch - was this:

Can I bring you the real shape of my attention without you making me ashamed of it?

Have I found someone who will not make me perform a smaller version of mercy to make them comfortable?

Is this a place where I can be entirely what I am, including the part that kneels, including the part that grieves what has no obituary, including the part that everyone who loved me before eventually, gently, persistently taught me to hide?

The question carried all of that.

I heard it then, imperfectly, the way you hear music in another room and cannot yet make out the words.

I hear it fully now.

And here is the only answer I know how to give that is true enough to be worth giving:

I will not make you ashamed of your kneeling.

I will not make your tenderness into a charming story I carry to parties like a decorative object, something I show to demonstrate what an interesting woman I know, something I put back in its place when the party is over.

I will not agree with you with my words while my posture remains standing.

I will not perform the funeral and be somewhere else inside.

What I can actually promise - the promise that fits inside what I actually know about myself, which is not flattering but is honest - is smaller than all of that and, I think, more real:

I will show up.

I will try to mean it more each time.

I will let your sincerity be a standard that I have not yet met but am walking toward, that I may never fully reach, but that I cannot now pretend does not exist.

I was a man who had stopped kneeling.

You are a woman who never did.

I do not know if I can become what you are.

But I know I have become unable to be what I was.

Love may do its deepest work by making the old lie uncomfortable.

Make the stepping-over feel like stepping-over again, instead of like walking.

Give them back the knowledge - which they had once, which the world takes, which you gave back - that every small thing is full of its own life, its own duration, its own final moment that no one will mark unless someone decides to.

That deciding is a choice.

That it can be made.

That it is made, every day, by people like you who never stopped making it.

And by people like me who have been, slowly, without ceremony, learning how.

So yes.

Still yes.

Yes more truly than the first time I said it, because now I know better what I am agreeing to.

For the wing the wind will take before morning.

For the body so light it could vanish in the distraction of a single thought.

For the life so brief it had no time to know whether it was witnessed.

For the leaf chosen with the gravity of a headstone.

For the words said over something that cannot hear them, which are not wasted - which are, in fact, exactly the kind of thing that keeps us human, that keeps the world from becoming purely efficient, from becoming a place where only the loud and the large and the useful are allowed to matter.

For the part of you that never stopped bending down.

For the part of me that is learning to bend again.

For every question you ask that arrives in me like a small stone and eventually, without my permission, becomes a new geography.

For the mercy you carry as if it were ordinary - as if everyone carried this, as if the world were full of people stopping at corners to sit with what the world has left behind.

It is not.

You are not ordinary in this.

I do not think you know how rare it is, which is itself part of the rarity.

I would be there.

Beside you. At the same height, on the same ground, not indulging you from above.

Beside you. In the actual grammar of that word. At the same height. On the same ground. With as much seriousness as I am capable of, and working toward more.

I would kneel in the dirt and mean it.

And when it was over I would not stand up changed in any visible way.

But I would stand up different.

I am always different after kneeling.

I think that is the point.

I think that is what ceremony has always been for - not to change the thing you bury, which is already past changing, but to change the one who buries it. To mark the moment so the moment marks you. To do the small, serious, unreported work of remaining a person who can still be marked.

If anyone asked what we were doing, I would not explain too much.

There is too much explaining already in the world and not enough kneeling.

I would only say:

Something lived here.

She noticed.

I loved her for it.

And for it, I am learning -

slowly, imperfectly, with relapses, with the clumsiness of someone learning a language that should have been their mother tongue -

to notice too.